Legal Opinion
Mujo v. Jani-King Int'l, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 31, 2018No. 3:16–cv–1990 (VAB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR A. BOLDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Simon Mujo and Indrit Muharremi, on behalf of a putative class of over 100 Jani-King franchisees (collectively "Plaintiffs"), have sued Jani-King International, Inc., Jani-King, Inc., and Jani-King of Hartford, Inc. (collectively "Jani-King"). In this diversity action, Mr. Mujo and Mr. Muharremi allege that Jani-King has unlawfully classified them as independent contractors under Connecticut Wage Laws, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-58 et seq. , and that the various fees, costs, client sales tax, and charge backs under Jani-King's franchise agreement…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mujo v. Jani-King International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Mujo v. Jani-King International, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Mujo v. Jani-King International, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019