Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Abramson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 1959No. 2272PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
A truck owned by the District of Columbia, assigned to the Recreation Department, and operated by one Holloway, an employee of that Department, negligently collided with and damaged an automobile owned and operated by David Abramson. He and his insurer sued the District and Holloway for damages. Holloway, who is no longer employed by the District, did not appear and was not represented by counsel. Trial was had without a jury and at its completion the trial court found that “at the time and place in question the vehicle was operated with the implied consent of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Capital Transit Company, a Corporation v. District of Columbia, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Brindamour v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Conrad v. PorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Jasper Porter v. J. Fairfax ConradCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Keeney v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lancaster v. CanuelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Sheppard v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Amicar Rentals, Inc. v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Barr v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1962
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975