Legal Opinion

Rice v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against the City of Portland and the MacMarr Stores, Inc., to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the conjoint negligence of their servants in the operation of two motor trucks, on one of which plaintiff was riding when injured. The defendants separately answered, both setting up contributory negligence as a defense to the action. The cause was tried before a jury and resulted in a judgment for plaintiff for $12,000, from which the defendants have appealed.

At the close of the testimony, defendants separately moved for a directed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Storm v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Parker v. HULT LUMBER & PLYWOOD COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Whisler v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Keeney v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Jensen v. Salem Sand and Gravel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API