Tevis v. Palatine Ins.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
1Opinion of the Court
WODVERTOÑ, District Judge.
Complaint was filed in the above cause in'the superior court of the state of California, in and for the city and county of San Francisco, on September 20, 1906, and, summons served upon the same day. September 28, 1906, the attorney for plaintiff made and delivered to defendant’s attorneys a stipulation, as follows:
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the defendant herein may have to and including the 10th day of October, 1906, within which to plead to ;he complaint on file herein or make such motion as it may be advised. This itipnlation need not be filed.
“Dated…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Austin v. GaganU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1889
- Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co. v. American Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1905
- Wilcox & Gibbs Guano Co. v. Phoenix Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1894
- Delbanco v. SingletaryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1889
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adams v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
- Williams v. Wilson Fruit Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1915
- Higson v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Citizens' Trust & Savings Bank v. HobbsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1918
- Yuba City Box Co. v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins.District Court, N.D. California · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.