Legal Opinion
Yuba City Box Co. v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 27, 1929No. Nos. 625-630PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ST. SURE, District Judge.
The question presented to the court on motions to remand in these cases is whether or not the petition for removal was filed “at the time, or any time before the defendant is required by the laws of the State or the rule of the State court in which such suit is brought to answer or plead.” Section 29, Judicial Code, 36 Stats. 1095, 28 USCA § 72. It was filed within an extension of time by stipulation of plaintiff “to demur, answer or otherwise plead.”
Because defendant attacks the general statement in La Flower v. Merrill (D. C.) 28 F.(2d) 784, at page 785, and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Austin v. GaganU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1889
- Adams v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
- La Flower v. MerrillDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1928
- Williams v. Wilson Fruit Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Saldibar v. Heiland Research Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1940
- Madden v. New York Life Ins.District Court, D. Idaho · 1939