Legal Opinion

Wilcox & Gibbs Guano Co. v. Phoenix Ins. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided April 5, 1894PublishedCited by 15 opinions

These actions were brought in a state court, and thence removed to this court by defendant. They are now heard together on motion to remand.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON TON, Circuit Judge.

These are motions to remand the causes to the state court. In each of them the same question is presented. In the second case an additional ground for removal peculiar to it is suggested. The plaintiff began several actions in the court of common pleas for the county of Charleston, S. O., against the several defendants, by summons and complaint. The complaint of the Mt. Pleasant & Sullivan’s Island Ferry Company was served on the defendant named therein on 25th January, 1894. The complaints in all the other cases were served on -the defendants named in them,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Steamship Co. v. TugmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. DaughtrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Austin v. GaganU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lucero v. MarronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Saldibar v. Heiland Research Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1940
  3. Waverly Stone & Gravel Co. v. Waterloo, C. F. & N. Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1917
  4. Fidelity Trust & Safety-Vault Co. v. Newport News & M. V. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1895
  5. Lord v. Lehigh Val. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API