Delbanco v. Singletary
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
Motion to Remand.
1Opinion of the CourtSabin, J.
The points involved in each of the above cases are substantially the same, and the cases are considered together, the same ruling being applicable to each case. The actions were begun in the state court, and removed to this court. Summons and complaint were served on' the defendant Singletary, May 27, 1889. By state statute defendants were required to plead or answer within 10 days after the date of service of summons, exclusive of the day of service, i. <?., June 6, 1889. On that day, to-wit, June 6, 1889, all of the defendants in the actions appeared by counsel, and filed demurrers to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Alley v. NottSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Babbitt v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Gregory v. HartleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Pullman Palace Car Co. v. SpeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wilcox & Gibbs Guano Co. v. Phoenix Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1894
- Ruby Canyon Gold Min. Co. v. HunterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Dakota · 1894
- Thompson v. Chicago, St. P. & K. C. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1894
- Chiatovich v. HanchettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
- Hamilton v. FowlerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.