Adams v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
At Law. Action by Earl Adams, by Robert D. Hamlin, guardian ad litem, against the Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Company.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
This is an action commenced in the staté court by service of summons and complaint on May 1, 1913. Notice of intention to file petition for removal, together with petition and bond, were served upon counsel for plaintiff May 21st following. The petition and bond were filed on May 22d, and an order entered by the judge of the state court approving the bond and ordering removal of the cause. Motion is here made to remand on the ground that the-petition was not filed in time. Section 29, c. 3, of the Judicial Code (Act of March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 St. at L.), provides:
“Whe…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. DaughtrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hansford v. Stone-Ordean-Wells Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Markey v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Saldibar v. Heiland Research Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1940
- Marking v. New St. Louis & Calhoun Packet Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1943
- Williams v. Wilson Fruit Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1915
- In re City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.