Legal Opinion

State v. Wischnofske

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 27, 1994No. TM92-0141; CA A76385PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

The state appeals the trial court’s order suppressing portions of a tape recording of statements defendant made while alone in the back seat of a patrol car following his arrest. Defendant cross-appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of his performance on field sobriety tests. We reverse on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.

On September 29, 1991, while investigating a two-car accident, Officer Eastham reasonably suspected that defendant had been driving under the influence of intoxicants in violation of ORS 813.010. Eastham advised defendant that their…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MorganCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  2. Campos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. RamirezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. EdrozoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. TimleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API