State v. Wischnofske
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
The state appeals the trial court’s order suppressing portions of a tape recording of statements defendant made while alone in the back seat of a patrol car following his arrest. Defendant cross-appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of his performance on field sobriety tests. We reverse on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.
On September 29, 1991, while investigating a two-car accident, Officer Eastham reasonably suspected that defendant had been driving under the influence of intoxicants in violation of ORS 813.010. Eastham advised defendant that their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MorganCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- Campos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. RamirezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. EdrozoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. TimleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.