Legal Opinion
State v. Ramirez
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 1995No. 18762PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
After a traffic stop a highway patrol officer secretly tape recorded a conversation between the driver and his companion while they were in custody in the back of the patrol vehicle. When they were released, the officer listened to the tape and heal’d the driver admit to his companion that cocaine was in his car. The trooper again stopped the vehicle, searched the ear and found cocaine. The driver was charged with possession of a controlled substance. His motion to suppress the taped admissions was denied. Following a discretionary appeal, we affirm.
FACTS
On a snowy February…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Spenner v. CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ChavezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GesingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BartonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.