Legal Opinion

Campos v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 2008No. 45S03-0804-CR-199PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

This case involves a traffic stop resulting in a vehicle search that uncovered cocaine. We hold that there was no probable cause to conduct the search, so consent was required. Because the officer communicated to the occupants of the car that consent to search was “necessary,” the ensuing purported consent was invalid. The search therefore violated both the Indiana and Federal Constitutions, and the seized cocaine may not be admitted in evidence.

A second issue arises because the two occupants of the car were seated in a police cruiser while the search proceeded, and they made…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Meredith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Joanna S. Robinson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Danielle Kelly v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Mary Osborne v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Nick McIlquham v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API