Legal Opinion

State v. Edrozo

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1998No. C4-96-2591PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Justice.

This pretrial appeal requires us to determine whether incriminating statements, which were made by a suspect to a companion while both were seated in the rear seat of a marked police car and which were secretly tape recorded, are admissible in a criminal trial for second-degree assault with a dangerous weapon. In addition,, we are asked to determine whether unrecorded voluntary statements made by the suspect away from-a place of detention are admissible. Because we hold that the lower court decisions suppressing the statements were clearly erroneous, we reverse.

On…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. State v. VanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API