Legal Opinion

Holt v. Peters

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 29, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSenter, J.

This suit grew out of a partnership between complainant, Holt, and defendant Peters, engaged in road and other construction work. Both parties had previously been engaged in the general contracting and construction business. Complainant was a civil engineer by training. The partnership began in the summer of 1920, and articles of copartnership were entered into between the parties. The articles of copartnership began with a contract at Hazard, Kentucky, for certain street paving. Holt, who was a civil engineer, made up the figures upon which R. L. Peters submitted a bid, and which bid was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shunken v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bagg v. OsbornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Shiro Nakamura v. Masaharu KondoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Green v. StacyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Levi v. KarrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API