Shiro Nakamura v. Masaharu Kondo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
In this action the plaintiff sought a dissolution of the partnership between himself and the defendant, and an accounting. The copartnership had been conducted under the name M-K Fisheries Company. After a hearing the court rendered an interlocutory judgment which provided: “1. That the partnership heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant, under the name of M-K Fisheries Company, be and the same is hereby dissolved. 2. That the plaintiff is entitled to an accounting, and an accounting is hereby ordered, showing the accounts of each of the parties hereto in the said partnership.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shunken v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Hyre v. LambertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Pilch v. MilikinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Wilson v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Driskill v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Olmo v. OlmoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.