Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2006No. DA 06-0029PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶1 Michael Marion Armstrong appeals from the judgment and sentencing order entered by the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, on his guilty pleas to the offenses of assault with a weapon and criminal mischief. We reverse and remand with instructions.

¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred by imposing alcohol and gambling restrictions as conditions of Armstrong’s suspended and deferred sentences.

BACKGROUND

¶3 The State of Montana charged Armstrong by information with the felony offense of assault with a weapon and the misdemeanor offense of criminal mischief.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. OmmundsonMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. HerdMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. BlackMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. KrollMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. LuceroMontana Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. AshbyMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. MeyersMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. KrumMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. MarshallMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. HinkleMontana Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API