Legal Opinion

State v. Kroll

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 2004No. 03-487PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Leonard Kroll (Kroll) appeals from the judgment entered by the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, imposing certain conditions as to the suspended portion of his sentence. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

¶2 The following issues are presented on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err by imposing conditions in the written judgment that it did not impose at the oral pronouncement of sentence?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err by imposing conditions of sentence that were not reasonably related to the underlying offense?

FACTUAL AND…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. LenihanMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. LaneMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. OmmundsonMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. BristerMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. BlackMontana Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. AshbyMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Miller v. Eighteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. EnglishMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. BurchMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. MalloyMontana Supreme Court · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API