State v. Krum
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶ 1 Defendant Herman Krum appeals his conviction for two counts of felony sexual assault. As part of Krum’s sentence, the District Court ordered him to pay “assessments” to three community entities. Krum challenges the sentence’s legality, and argues that the District Court was without authority to impose these assessments. We reverse and remand with instructions to strike the illegal portion of the sentence.
¶2 We restate the issues as follows:
¶3 I. Did the District Court err in sentencing Krum to pay a $5,000 assessment to the Park County Court Automation Fund, a $2,500 assessment to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HicksMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. VernesMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. RuizMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ArmstrongMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. McIntireMontana Supreme Court · 2004
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HEAFNERMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. StephensonMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Kalispell v. SalsgiverMontana Supreme Court · 2019
- In re G.M.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.