Legal Opinion

State v. Marshall

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 2007No. DA 06-0187PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Michael Marshall (Marshall) appeals from the order of the Fifth Judicial District Court, Jefferson County, revoking his deferred sentence and committing Marshall to the Department of Corrections for eight years with four years suspended. The court ordered that Marshall would not be eligible for parole until he successfully completes phases I and II of the sex offender treatment program, which he challenges on appeal. We affirm.

¶2 We consider the following issue on appeal:

¶3 Did the District Court err in imposing sex offender treatment as a condition of sentence because:

a. The treatment can…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. OmmundsonMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MuhammadMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. HeathMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. WebbMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. ArmstrongMontana Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. StilesMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. HernandezMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. HernandezMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. HoltMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. HoltMontana Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API