Legal Opinion

State v. Sorrell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 2, 1981No. 176-80PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnderwood, J.

The defendant was charged, in District Court of Vermont, Chittenden Circuit, Unit No. 2, with the crime of armed robbery. 13 V.S.A. § 608(b). A plea of not guilty and an alibi defense were entered. Trial was by jury. At the close of the State’s case the defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that the State had failed to prove a prima facie case. The motion was denied. After the jury returned a verdict of guilty, the defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. This motion was also denied and a judgment on the verdict issued. Defendant appeals from that judgment.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodmansee v. StonemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  2. State v. DupawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  3. State v. EatonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  4. State v. LaroseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. State v. GoodhartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KennisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. State v. OnoratoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  3. State v. DezaineSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. State v. LangdellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  5. State v. Salahdin TrowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API