State v. Langdell
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Defendant appeals from his conviction of burglary fol lowing a jury trial in Lamoille District Court. Defendant argues that the State failed to produce enough evidence with regard to the intent element of this offense and that the jury instructions on this element were confusing and prejudicial. We affirm.
¶ 2. Defendant was discovered in the basement of a residence located at 625 Route 15 in Johnson, Vermont, in the early morning hours of January 31, 2008. Upon hearing “someone ... in the basement hollering,” the two residents called 911. Defendant remained in the basement until police…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Paul J. Heideman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. PelicanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. KinneySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Anthony BridgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- State v. Kyle A.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- Sarah Massucco v. James M. Kolodziej and Barbara H. KolodziejSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- State v. Scott PhillipsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- In re Anthony BridgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017