Legal Opinion
State v. Onorato
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 14, 1982No. 253-81PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUnderwood, J.
The defendant was charged with the crime of sexual assault. 13 V.S.A. § 3252(1) (A). He was found guilty by a jury, and he timely appeals from the judgment thereon. As grounds for appeal the defendant claims that (1) the State did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt the identity of the defendant as the person who committed the offense, (2) the trial court erred in denying the defendant the right to introduce expert testimony on the issue of reliability of eyewitness identification, and (3) that he was denied his constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury. We disagree with all three of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Tommie Louis Brown, United States of America v. Virgil David Swain, United States of America v. Robert Lee NoblesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- State v. PorraroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- State v. HohmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Currier v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Bloodsworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Commonwealth v. FrancisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Campbell v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.