Legal Opinion
Woodmansee v. Stoneman
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 21, 1975No. 182-72, 173-72 and 74-73PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.
Three appeals, all arising from the same criminal charge and conviction, were argued together in this Court. Appellant Woodmansee was charged below with violation of 13 V.S.A. § 5, by assisting one Frank Berard to avoid arrest and punishment for the crime of murder. See State v. Berard, 132 Vt. 138, 315 A.2d 501 (1974).
In No. 182-72, an appeal was taken from the order of the Windsor County (now Superior) Court denying appellant’s habeas corpus petition. No. 173-72 was an attempt to invoke the original jurisdiction of this Court to compel action by the District Court as to motions and related…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- United States v. HissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- State v. BerardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- State v. TeitleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Duffy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. LaphamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Engberg v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. GortonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.