Legal Opinion
State v. Dupaw
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 17, 1976No. 277-75PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The present appeal arises from the conviction of appellant Joseph Dupaw in the District Court of Vermont, Unit No. 3, Franklin Circuit, for the offense of armed robbery, in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 608(b). In-depth recitation of the facts involved in the commission of the crime is not required in the context of the current appeal. Appellant has raised several serious questions concerning the propriety of the verdict. Arguing on the basis of the standard established by this Court in Woodmansee v. Stoneman, 133 Vt. 449, 344 A.2d 26 (1975), he alleges that the State’s case consisted solely of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. BadgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- State v. BarronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- State v. DelaozSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.