Legal Opinion

Alarm Device Manufacturing Co. v. Arnold Industries, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1979No. L-78-312PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Defendant-appellant, Arnold Industries, Inc., appeals from a finding in a non-jury trial in the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County in the sum of $8,618.99, with in terest, in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, Alarm Device Manufacturing Company.

Plaintiff had its place of business at Syosset, New York. Defendant did business at 3011 Council Street, Toledo, Ohio. Taos Equipment Company manufactured wood splitters using steel screws, which had been sold by plaintiff to defendant. Taos Equipment Company was based at Taos, New Mexico.

The final judgment for plaintiff arises from a claim on a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Associated Hardware Supply Co. v. The Big Wheel Distributing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. Campbell v. YokelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Automotive Spares Corp. v. Archer Bearings Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  4. Don's Marine, Inc. v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Clifton Cattle Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cox Engineering, Inc. v. Funston MacHine & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Columbus Trade Exchange, Inc. v. AMCA International Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  3. Degnan v. Goodwill Industries of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Bowling Transportation, Inc. v. GreggOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Cline v. Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API