Legal Opinion

Cox Engineering, Inc. v. Funston MacHine & Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1988No. 2-87-138-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARRIS, Justice.

The primary issue in this case is whether an alleged oral agreement is brought within the “merchant’s exception” to the UCC statute of frauds by a pair of invoices sent by the seller and received by the buyer. See TEX.BUS. & COM.CODE ANN. sec. 2.201(b) (Tex.UCC) (Vernon 1968). The buyer/appellee, Funston Machine and Supply Company, moved for summary judgment on the ground that any oral agreement between Funston and the seller/appellant, Cox Engineering, Inc., was unenforceable under the applicable statute of frauds. See TEX.BUS. & COM.CODE ANN. sec. 2.201(a) (Tex.UCC)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Azevedo v. MinisterNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Jem Patents, Inc. v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Dalesso v. Reliable-Triple Cee of North Jersey, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Alarm Device Manufacturing Co. v. Arnold Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Maranatha Temple, Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  3. Gonzalez v. Nielson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  4. Khoury v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Kimmell v. Leoffler, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API