Legal Opinion

Degnan v. Goodwill Industries of Toledo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1995No. L-94-250PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sherck, Judge.

This appeal comes to us from a summary judgment granted by the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas in favor of an employer in a handicap discrimination case. Because we conclude that genuine issues of material fact exist, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

In October 1989, appellant, Dennis P. Degnan, began working for appellee, Goodwill Industries, Inc. At the time of his hiring, appellee was aware that appellant was designated as “permanently partially disabled” and suffered from chronic pain as a result of a previous back injury sustained while employed by Toledo…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lorain National Bank v. Saratoga ApartmentsOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Barker v. Scovill, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Premier Industrial Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Dalton v. Jefferson Smurfit Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
  3. Martinez v. Ohio Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. White v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Dawson v. Qube Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API