Legal Opinion

State v. Thorp

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 28, 2000No. AC 18539PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*114 Opinion

HENNESSY, J.

The defendant, Ronald Thorp, appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the motion by the office of adult probation to modify the conditions of the defendant’s probation. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) enlarged the conditions of his probation prior to the commencement of the probationary term in violation of General Statutes § 53a-30 (c) and (2) imposed additional, more restrictive conditions on his probation without first permitting him to withdraw his guilty plea. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. State v. RobersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. State v. RepettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. State v. DorissConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. State v. GardnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API