Legal Opinion

State v. Doriss

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 17, 2004No. AC 23941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The defendant, William H. Doriss, appeals from the judgments of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of two counts of failure to restrain an animal from doing injury to another animal in violation of General *544Statutes § 53-247 (a).1 The trial court sentenced the defendant to two years of incarceration, execution suspended, and ordered him to pay restitution in the amount of $2855. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the state engaged in improper closing argument that deprived him of a fair trial and (2) the court abused its discretion by requiring him to pay…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. State v. HueySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. State v. James G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Vitti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FauciConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. State v. QuintConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. State v. BinnetteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. State v. SILAS S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API