Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 1, 2001No. SC 16336PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the due process clause of the federal constitution requires that a defendant be afforded a court hearing with counsel before a defendant’s conditions of probation may be modified by the probation authorities. After a hearing held pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-*83232 (a),1 the trial court, Rodriguez, J., found the defendant, Emanuel Smith,2 in violation of one of the conditions of his probation and rendered judgment imposing the defendant’s original sentence of eight years imprisonment, which had been suspended. The defendant…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. CeballosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. ConeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. SinvilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Collins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.