Bank of Italy v. Cadenasso
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This cause is before us for a hearing in hank upon an order granting said hearing after decision by department one of this court.
We have given consideration to the points made by appellants in their original briefs and also' in the briefs filed since said order granting a hearing in bank was made, and we are of the view that the findings of the trial court are supported by the evidence. The rule is that if there is any substantial evidence in the record by which the findings of the trial court may be sustained this court will not disturb the judgment appealed from.
While appellants…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bank of Italy v. CadenassoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cadenasso v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Benson v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Cox v. KlatteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- In Re Cary's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Partrick v. PartrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.