Legal Opinion

Bank of Italy v. Cadenasso

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 11861PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This cause is before us for a hearing in hank upon an order granting said hearing after decision by department one of this court.

We have given consideration to the points made by appellants in their original briefs and also' in the briefs filed since said order granting a hearing in bank was made, and we are of the view that the findings of the trial court are supported by the evidence. The rule is that if there is any substantial evidence in the record by which the findings of the trial court may be sustained this court will not disturb the judgment appealed from.

While appellants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bank of Italy v. CadenassoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cadenasso v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Benson v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Cox v. KlatteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. In Re Cary's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Partrick v. PartrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API