Legal Opinion

Partrick v. Partrick

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1952No. Civ. 4282PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for annulment of marriage against defendant upon the ground that at the time of the purported marriage ceremony between them defendant was married to one Charles Orr, from whom she had only obtained an interlocutory decree of divorce. The final decree was obtained on April 7, 1941, about six months after the marriage. These facts are conceded. Defendant showed that she married Orr in 1922, and due to his being a chronic alcoholic, leaving home for short periods of time and committing acts of cruelty upon her, she divorced him in 1934. She obtained custody of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Flanagan v. Capital National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Bank of Italy v. CadenassoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ceja v. Rudolph & Sletten, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Patterson v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Sutton v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API