Sink Ex Rel. Pullen v. Moore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
The scene of this occurrence was in a residential area outside the limits of the city of Winston-Salem. Consequently, no city ordinance requiring dogs to be kept under restraint is involved. G.S. 106-381 provides that "when an animal becomes vicious or a menace to the public health,” its owner may not permit the animal to leave the premises on which it is kept unless it is on a leash and in the care of a responsible person.
There is in this record no evidence that the little dog, Corky, was either vicious or a menace to the public health. On the contrary, the evidence is that he had never been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Raper v. McCRORY-McLELLAN CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Schmid v. HumphreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Knowles v. MulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Endresen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Miller Ex Rel. Yeager v. SnipesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Hood v. HaglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Heath Ex Rel. Heath v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.