Legal Opinion

Sink Ex Rel. Pullen v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1966No. 440PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

The scene of this occurrence was in a residential area outside the limits of the city of Winston-Salem. Consequently, no city ordinance requiring dogs to be kept under restraint is involved. G.S. 106-381 provides that "when an animal becomes vicious or a menace to the public health,” its owner may not permit the animal to leave the premises on which it is kept unless it is on a leash and in the care of a responsible person.

There is in this record no evidence that the little dog, Corky, was either vicious or a menace to the public health. On the contrary, the evidence is that he had never been…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Raper v. McCRORY-McLELLAN CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Schmid v. HumphreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. Knowles v. MulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Endresen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Miller Ex Rel. Yeager v. SnipesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Hood v. HaglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Heath Ex Rel. Heath v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API