Legal Opinion
Horne v. United States Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 9, 2014No. 10-15270PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:
To ensure stable market conditions, the Secretary of Agriculture, administering a complex regulatory program, requires California producers of certain raisins to divert a percentage of their annual crop to a reserve. The percentage of raisins diverted to the reserve varies annually according to that year’s crop output. Subject to administrative and judicial review, the Secretary can impose a penalty on producers who fail to comply with the diversion program. The program’s goal is to keep raisin supply relatively constant from year to year, smoothing the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Horne v. Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC v. State of Hawaii Land Use Comm.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Lawrence HoganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Sarah Brooks v. City of Des MoinesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Levin v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.