Legal Opinion
Levin v. City & County of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 21, 2014No. 3:14-cv-03352-CRBPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
In July 2014, the City and County of San Francisco enacted an Ordinance that requires property owners wishing to withdraw their rent-controlled property from the rental market to pay a lump sum to displaced tenants. The 2014 Ordinance requires that property owners pay the greáter of a relocation payment due under a 2005 Ordinance or the new, “enhanced” amount: twenty-four times the difference between the units’ current monthly rate and an amount that purports to be the fair market value of a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coyne v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Beach & Bluff Conservancy v. City of Solana Beach, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bldg. Indus. Ass'n-Bay Area v. City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- BBLI Edison LLC v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- BBLI Edison LLC v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.