Sarah Brooks v. City of Des Moines
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Circuit Judge.
Six drivers sued the City of Des Moines and Gatso USA, Inc., arguing that the Automatic Traffic Enforcement (ATE) system violates federal and state law. The district court dismissed the drivers’ claims. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms in part, reverses in part, and remands.
I
In 2011, the City, by ordinance, authorized an ATE system. Des Moines, Iowa Mun. Code § 114-243. The City contracted with Gatso to install and operate the system. When a vehicle speeds or runs a red light, an ATE camera takes an image. Gatso then mails a Notice of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Arizona Right to Life Political Action Committee v. Betsy Bayless Janet Napolitano, in Her Official Capacity as the Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Horne v. Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Gary Hughes v. City of Cedar RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Battle Sports Science, LLC v. Shock Doctor, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2016
- City of Cedar Rapids v. Marla Marie LeafSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Abigail Farella v. District Judge A.J. AnglinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2026
- Carmesha Veneable v. Equifax Information Services LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2026
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.