Timberlake v. Schwank
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their action upon motion of defendants Trailer ancho Corporation, and Herb Schwank, its agent. The action was premised upon a complaint setting forth six causes of action. Defendants answered. Subsequently plaintiffs dismissed the second, fifth and sixth causes of action. Thereafter defendants moved to dismiss the remaining causes of action, i.e., the first, third and fourth, upon the ground neither of them stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court granted the motion and entered judgment of dismissal.
An action may be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kronkright v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973