Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1926No. Docket No. L.A. 8621PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINCH, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendants from the judgment herein quieting plaintiff’s title to certain real 'estate.

The complaint is in the usual form in actions to quiet title. It alleges that the plaintiff is the owner and in possession of the property and that the defendants, “without right, basis or foundation whatsoever,” claim “some right, title, interest or estate in and to said property adverse to the plaintiff.” The answer denies that the plaintiff is the owner or in possession of the property and, as separate defenses, alleges that W. J. Pearson, the husband of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bickerdike v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nevins v. NevinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Syme v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Denning v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. San Diego Improvement Co. v. BrodieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Lowe v. PennCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API