Legal Opinion

Central National Bank v. Bell

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1936No. Sac. 4929PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff, an insolvent national banking association, acting through its duly qualified receiver, brought this action to quiet its title to and recover possession of 8,000 acres of land consisting of town lots and acreage, situated partly in Stanislaus County and partly in Merced County. Some of the answering defendants denied the plaintiff’s title deraigned through sales under deeds of trust, and alleged fraud and conspiracy in the conduct of the sales thereunder. The issues were tried, some before the court with a jury, and the equitable issues by the court without a jury. The court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sorensen v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. San Diego Improvement Co. v. BrodieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Munger v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McLaughlin Land & Livestock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Homestead Savings v. DarmientoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API