Legal Opinion
George Leal v. John McHugh
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 26, 2013No. 12-40069PublishedCited by 217 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellants, George Leal and John M. Lozano, appeal the district court judgment granting Defendant-Appellee John McHugh’s 1 motion to dismiss Appellants’ age discrimination claims and Leal’s retaliation claim, as well as the court’s denial of their request for leave to amend their complaint. We AFFIRM IN PART and REVERSE AND REMAND IN PART.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Appellants allege the following facts in their First Amended Complaint: 2
Plaintiff-Appellants John Lozano (“Lo-zano”), born in 1947, and George Leal (“Leal”), born in 1953,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by217 opinions
- Body by Cook, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- James Reynolds v. Daniel M. TangherliniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Michael Bynane v. The Bank of New York Mellon, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- IberiaBank Corporation v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Ralph Arthur v. Pet DairyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.