Legal Opinion
Ralph Arthur v. Pet Dairy
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 9, 2015No. 13-2530UnpublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2Per curiam
Ralph Arthur (“Appellant”) sued his employer, Pet Dairy (“Appellee”), alleging that he was terminated because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). He appeals from the district court’s order of summary judgment in his employer’s favor.
To lodge a claim of age discrimination, a plaintiff may proceed through either of two avenues of proof: by raising a presumption of discrimination, or by offering direct or circumstantial evidence of the employer’s…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by42 opinions
- Foster v. University of Maryland-Eastern ShoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Tammy Bandy v. City of Salem, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- Wilson v. City of ChesapeakeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- Boney v. Trs. of Cape Fear Cmty. Coll.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Alexander v. Carolina Fire Control Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.