Saxton v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal-from Cass Circuit Court. — Hon. W. L. Jarrott, Judge. (1) Instruction C was vicious and was properly refused at the trial. The granting ©f a new trial because of such refusal was error. Chappell v. Allen, 38 Mo. 213; Raysdon v. Trumbo, 52 Mo. 35; Siegrist v. Arnot, 10 Mo. App. 197; Ehrlich v. Ins. Co., 15 Mo. App. 579; Clay v. Railroad, 17 Mo. App. 629; State v. Holmes, 17 Mo. 379; Shaffner v. Leahy, 21 Mr. App. 110; Weil v. Schwartz, 21 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal-from Cass Circuit Court. — Hon. W. L. Jarrott, Judge. (1) Instruction C was vicious and was properly refused at the trial. The granting ©f a new trial because of such refusal was error. Chappell v. Allen, 38 Mo. 213; Raysdon v. Trumbo, 52 Mo. 35; Siegrist v. Arnot, 10 Mo. App. 197; Ehrlich v. Ins. Co., 15 Mo. App. 579; Clay v. Railroad, 17 Mo. App. 629; State v. Holmes, 17 Mo. 379; Shaffner v. Leahy, 21 Mr. App. 110; Weil v. Schwartz, 21 Mo. App. 372; Hackman v. Maguire, 20 Mo. App. 286; Judd v. Railroad, 23 Mo. App. 56; Bank v. Metcalf, 29 Mo. App. 384; McClure v. Ritchey, 30 Mo. App.…
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.
The plaintiff, a man far advanced in years, his age being three score and twelve, who was presumably under some physical disability, for he was a pensioner of the United States, on July 14, 1896, accompanied by his daughter-in-law and her infant child came from Louisburg, in the State of Kansas, to Harris onville, in this State, where the latter intended to take passage on defendant’s Joplin train for Webb City. Plaintiff purchased a ticket entitling his daughter-in-law to passage on said train to the last named station. On the arrival of the train at Harrisonville he accompanied her into the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Block v. Milwaukee Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Yarnell v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Hite v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- McFadin v. CatronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. GosnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Kappes v. Brown Shoe Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Rosenweig v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.