Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. McWhorter

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1934No. 24922PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkin, J.

The provisions of Section 1465-61, General Code, which specify the persons to whom state industrial insurance shall apply, are very broad:

“The term ‘employee’, ‘workman’ and ‘operative’ as used in this act, shall be construed to mean:
“(1) Every person in the service of the state, or of any county, city, township, incorporated village or school district therein, including regular members of lawfully constituted police and fire departments of cities and villages, under any appointment or contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written, except any official of the state, or of any county,…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. County of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Boehm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Weber County-Ogden City Relief Committee v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API