Legal Opinion

Boehm v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1986No. F006320PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAMLIN, J.

Petitioners Irene Boehm and other Merced County residents who receive general assistance welfare payments (GA) seek mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Merced County to issue a preliminary injunction against the reduction of GA by the Merced County Board of Supervisors (the County) and the Merced County Department of Human Resources (the Department) and to grant petitioners’ motion for summary judgment.

The issue presented is whether the County acted arbitrarily and capriciously in reducing GA grants to levels sufficient to provide only minimum subsistence needs for food…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mooney v. PickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. IT Corp. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Saldana v. Globe-Weis Systems Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Mendly v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Cooke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API