DeRousse v. Higginson
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BAKES, Justice.
This entire controversy revolves around a construction and interpretation of §§ 42-605 and 42-607, Idaho Code, as amended, which grant to the watermaster of a water district certain powers and duties in connection with the distribution of waters from public streams in his district. The factual background is undisputed as shown by the affidavits filed with the court in connection with the plaintiff-respondent’s motion for summary judgment which was granted by the trial court. This appeal is taken by the defendants-appellants from that order granting the motion for summary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Messenger v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Jorstad v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Sampson v. LaytonIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. RaynerIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Wellard v. MarcumIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Athay v. StaceyIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- State, Dept. of Parks v. IDAHO DEPT, WATER ADMIN.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Walker v. Nationwide Fin. Corp. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Sears v. BerrymanIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Leonard Construction Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.