Legal Opinion

Graham v. Leek

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1943No. 7113PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunlap, J.

As appears from the pleadings, this suit involves a conflict between respondent and appellant over the right to the use of the public waters of Three Mile Creek in Camas County, Idaho, a tributary of Upper Malad River. This creek is also known as Four Mfle Creek. However, as appears by the evidence the waters actually involved in the conflict are from the flow of the East Fork or Branch of said Three Mile Creek.

The amount of the flow of the creek is not disclosed by the pleadings or the evidence, but it does appear it is what is known as a “flash” creek, with its run-off from the melting…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. St. Onge v. BlakelyMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Reno v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Farmers' Co-Operative Ditch Co. v. Riverside Irrigation District, Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Joyce Livestock Co. v. United StatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Gilbert v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Jenkins v. State, Dept. of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Cantlin v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API