Doe v. Marsh
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
McAVOY, Chief Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
The defendants, NAOMI MARSH, JOAN L. MILOWE, ARLENE SHEFFIELD, REBECCA GARDNER, and THOMAS SO-BOL, have moved for summary judgment. The plaintiffs, JOHN DOE and JANE ROE, two HIV 1 positive individuals, oppose the defendants’ summary judgment motion and have cross-moved for summary judgment in their favor.
In brief, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants, either directly or by failing to prop erly supervise, violated their constitutionally-protected right to privacy, and thus 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and committed a breach of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doe v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Doe v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Pisciotti v. County of WayneDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- (PC) Holmes v. BaughmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Santos v. County of HumboldtDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.