Santos v. County of Humboldt
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 STEVEN A. SANTOS, Case No. 22-cv-07485-RMI 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS 10 v. Re: Dkt. No. 12 11 COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, 12 Defendant. 13 14 Now pending before the court is Defendant’s Motion (dkt. 12) seeking dismissal of 15 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Plaintiff has responded (dkt. 17) and Defendant has 16 replied (dkt. 18); the Motion is therefore ripe for decision. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 17 Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the court finds the matter…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.