Legal Opinion
Doe v. Marsh
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 22, 1997No. 481, Docket 96-7453PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-appellants John Doe (“Doe”) and Jane Roe (“Roe”) appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, Chief J.), granting defendants’-appellees’ motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity and dismissing their § 1983 complaint alleging violation of their right to privacy. See Doe v. Marsh, 918 F.Supp. 580 (N.D.N.Y.1996). We conclude that the state officials’ actions at issue were objectively reasonable, and therefore affirm.
Background
Doe and Roe are HIV-positive individuals who are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Dorsett v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Doe v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Oliver v. CuttlerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Dodson v. Board of Education of the Valley Stream Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.