Legal Opinion
Imada v. City of Hercules
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 17, 1998No. 97-15405PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Dave A Imada, et al are police officers employed by appellee City of Hercules. The officers appeal the district court’s summary judgment for the City and dismissal of their complaint for back pay and damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-209. The principal issue is whether the FLSA requires the City to compensate the officers for time spent commuting from their homes to mandatory off-site training when that time exceeds their regular commuting time. The district court ruled compensation is not required because the FLSA, as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. New York City Transit Authority, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Maria Vega, Eva Trevino, on Behalf of Herself and as Next Friend of Pedro Trevino v. John W. GasperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United Transportation Union Local 1745 v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Hardy v. Lewis Gale Medical Center, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019
- Little v. Technical Specialty Products, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2013
- Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- David Kavanagh v. Grand Union Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.