Steiner v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren
This case raises an issue of coverage under the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, with respect to work performed before or after the direct or productive labor for which the worker is primarily paid.
The precise question is whether workers in a battery plant must be paid as a part of their “principal” activities for the time incident to changing clothes at the beginning of the shift and showering at the end, where they must make extensive use of dangerously caustic and toxic materials, and are compelled by circumstances, including vital considerations of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Steiner v. Mitchell, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. King Packing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
3Cited by383 opinions
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Kuebel v. Black & Decker Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Nancy Kosakow v. New Rochelle Radiology Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
378 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.